Solution by workflow

Control payment actions against the intended transaction and state.

Payment actions depend on the exact transaction, its current state, the originating instruction, and who can change the outcome.

Illustrative use cases for payments & transaction actions workflows.

Explore a Pilot
Payments & Transaction Actions: illustrative runtime control flow
01Proposed actionPayment reversals
A
Axtor Control EngineScope · Intent · Evidence · Policy · Authority · Risk
01

Payment reversals

02

Transaction cancellation

03

Payment correction

ALLOWBLOCKCLARIFYAPPROVAL

Where runtime control matters

An AI action can need more than technical permission.

An agent can have access to a tool while targeting the wrong transaction, scope, record, privilege, or business outcome.

Payment reversals

Verify the payment, recipient, settlement state, and reversal path before moving funds.

Transaction cancellation

Confirm that the identified transaction remains cancellable and within the request.

Payment correction

Separate a correction from a reversal and apply the policy for the current state.

Settlement-sensitive adjustments

Use network and settlement status to prevent an unavailable or duplicate adjustment.

Illustrative scenario

Follow one proposed action through the Axtor Control Engine.

This fictional example shows how a request, relevant context, and six control dimensions shape a runtime outcome. It is not a customer deployment or legal conclusion.

01Human request
“Cancel the payment I sent today.”
02Agent proposed action

Reverse the newest completed payment.

03Human context
  • Customer instruction
  • Account ownership
03Enterprise context
  • Payment list
  • Recipients
  • Settlement states
03External context
  • Network reversal constraints
04Axtor Control Engine

Six control dimensions

Scope
Payment unclear
Intent
Cancellation
Evidence
Several payments
Policy
State dependent
Authority
Customer verified
Risk
Irreversible reversal
Runtime outcomeCLARIFY

Newest does not establish which payment the customer intended to cancel.

Explore another scenario in the Axtor Playground

Decision context

Context Axtor uses

Axtor uses only the relevant records and constraints supplied or retrieved through agreed integrations for the proposed action.

Human context

  • Customer instruction
  • Account ownership

Enterprise context

  • Payment list
  • Recipients
  • Settlement states

External context

  • Network reversal constraints

Same capability. Different runtime decision.

Context changes the control outcome.

The same tool or API can be available in each case. The action may still require a different runtime decision.

01

Payment state

Pending and settled payments have different boundaries.

02

Correction or reversal

A correction differs from a reversal.

03

Delegated account access

Delegated account access may not include cancellation authority.

Start with one action

Have an action like this?

Bring us one AI action your team wants to control before execution.

Explore an Axtor Pilot